It was over two years ago now that I think about it. “What the Bleep” was being presented on campus at my son’s university. He had already seen the movie and, was going in hopes of meeting others on campus interested in the same thing.
I had special ordered a copy of the movie as soon as it came out. Well was my son familiar with the subject. I’d raised him from a child with an understanding of it. Members of the film crew were there, on campus, for the special presentation. Little did they know when they met my son, that he possessed a more in depth understanding of the subject then they did.
That Christmas I was presented with an autographed copy of the book “What the Bleep” that had recently been published. My son had purchased it for me when he went to see the movie. That holiday season I would read a chapter out loud every night, as my husband enjoyed listening to me read. The book went more in depth into each subject, which both of us enjoyed. Later, this increased depth would be made into another edition of the movie, called “Down the Rabbit Hole”, which I also ordered for myself in advance.
I had a mixed response to the understanding shared. I was elated that something about the subject was finally coming out in the media. Finally. It was about blankety blank blank time from my perspective. So I was happy. What I had been waiting for, for so long, was happening. Consciousness was now in movement.
On the flip side, I was irritated because what was shared was so shallow in understanding. Yes, I said shallow but I mean no disrespect. I’m encouraged that more of us are becoming interested in swimming these waters. I just don’t usually play around in the shallow end. I don’t like all the waves and the splashing. I prefer swimming the deeper waters.
I knew rampant confusion was going to ensue, as our false egos took off trying to use the information to further enable our emotional insecurities. That was the direction both the movie and the book presented. A lot of mental and analytical interpretation, studied in a scientific way.
I don’t mean to imply anything ‘wrong’ with this approach, except for the fact that I already know no understanding could ever come from it. Been there, done that already. I didn’t start out with a mystical bent. I started out as an engineer, studying magnetic fields. I can recognize dead ends because I found the same ones myself. Already. What seems like long ago.
I knew of J.Z. Knight since the days when she wore a pyramid shaped hat on her head made of aluminum foil. I had read her ‘channels’ of Ramtha in 1988. I enjoyed J.Z. I appreciated her allowing her eccentricity to show. It was something I was afraid of doing, so she had my admiration, too. She was out in the world expressing her Self while I was sitting behind the scenes, carving my sculptures, imagining how clever I was to come up with a means of expression where “I” wouldn’t be required to show myself. Where ‘others’ would look at my work and, not me.
“Make Known the Unknown.”
There is an underlying foundation in the thinking patterns of the “What the Bleep” movie and book, the “Down the Rabbit Hole” movie, too, as well as another movie, “The Secret”. It’s also in the perspective of J.Z. Knight and many wonderful other people like her, that is invalid when it comes to the understanding of Spirit or God or the Quantum Field. When it comes to understanding fields of Consciousness.
And that is, we cannot in any way perceive to separate ourselves from it and, at the same time come to any kind of in depth understanding of Unity. You can’t get there from here, basically.
We can’t start from polarity and reason our way up to unity. We can only start from unity and reason our way down, invalidating all our contradictory ideas as we go.
We can’t come to know it, from a scientific approach of repetitive results, either. It doesn’t work that way. Consciousness is not solid, it is fluid and every changing, molding itself into any form we imagine. We can only come to know it, from the perspective of adventuring into it. An adventurer, a pioneer, isn’t looking for what’s repetitive. That would nullify the very nature of the adventuring.
We can’t ‘boldly go where no man has gone before’ down a paved road.
My understanding has come as a result of saving my own life. Polarity and duality was killing me. I had been born with both hemispheres of my brain equally active and dominant. I wasn’t only a type A, I was a type B, as well. Not “or” but “and”.
Duality patterns set me at war with myself. That meant I was in a lose/lose situation no matter what side of myself I chose.
There weren’t enough of us born this way, the Research Institute told my parents, to know what to do with us or to help us. Most of us didn’t live very long, waging a constant battle within ourselves. I was going to have to come up with my own solution, if any of my internal conflicts were going to be resolved. With that as my goal, I set off upon my path, I leaped down the rabbit hole,filled with a determination, that would require both half’s of my brain, learning how to exist in unison and cooperation. I was going to have to fuse the polarities.
I developed a nose like a bloodhound for sniffing out contradictions and concepts of separation. As soon as I found one, I threw it out of my reality. I didn’t sweep my dust under the carpet. I hunted for it and got it out of my house.
I noticed ‘others’ calling themselves ‘channels’. Many I counted as friends. As much as I would have liked being a ‘channel’ just like them, I knew it wasn’t for me. They all went into some sort of altered state, and then another ‘being’ would start expressing themselves through them. Their conscious level was always separated from the experience of accessing the other levels and, I didn’t have the same respite. I couldn’t ever turn the awareness off.
I had always experienced it directly connected to my central nervous system. When everything feels like you, it’s hard to separate yourself from the experience. A conscious channel, that’s it, that’s me. With the way I was born, everything has to be integrated. There can be no conflicts or separations between conscious, subconscious and super conscious, between Spirit, Mind and Body. Otherwise, I feel sick, I’d feel ill at ease. It is a very debilitating experience, with feelings of worthlessness following closely on its heels.
I’m writing now to speak up.
“Sue Ann! Make known the unknown!” it says in the signed copy of the book I have, written there by Betsy Chasse. I chuckle, for little did Betsy realize on a conscious level who would receive that message. I bet she wrote the same one in all the books she signed.
So OK. “Make known the unknown.” …
Most of what I’ve seen and read so far has been written and expressed by those of us who don’t consciously understand very much of what they’re talking about. There, I said it. I made known the unknown. Now I only hope I haven’t made a bunch of people unhappy with me and how my sentiment may cast certain lights upon them.
That’s the way Illumination always is, it always brings out all our shadows. I’ve simply decided to count on our hearts being true. Our desires to know and understand, being genuine.
The importance of asking great questions is stressed, given an example in the question, “is the number 5 married?”
Yes, the number five is married. It is married to the shape tetrahedron. That wasn’t exactly a great question.
Now the question Betsy asks herself on page 8 of the book is a great question. She writes, “I want to know if I’m truly capable of feeling unconditional love. This is not just an abstract for me. Unconditional Love is on my agenda – it’s how I want to be, at least for my husband and my daughter – but if I’m honest with myself, I’m not sure I’ve ever felt it.”
Now THAT’S a great question.
And the answer is, YES, we are ALL capable and, NO, most of us have never felt it.
Most of us don’t even have a clue to understanding it. I know I didn’t when I first started out. Unconditional Love is Unconditional. It CAN’T be related to ANY conditions or it isn’t Unconditional. Like if I feel unconditional love, it isn’t going to be reserved for just a few, on the condition that a person means anything to me. There’s going to be nothing exclusive to it or about it at all.
“Make known the unknown.”
Another thing is the use of an example of us wanting something. Like a guy wanting to have a new car. So the guidance is offered for him to use his imagination to imagine being IN that new car, feeling all the experiences of having it and driving it.
Well…, that’s good advise as far as it goes. “Having” is bound to produce different results then “wanting”. But nothing has been mentioned or said or addressed, about the guy’s emotional issues of worth and esteem that he yearns for the new car to make up for: a material placebo for worth he doesn’t feel. He can imagine all he desires and so long as he is desiring it, from a perspective of self depletion, self depreciation and, self doubt about his worth, all his creations are going to be mirrors of these lacks.
Maybe if this had been addressed, there wouldn’t have been and wouldn’t be right now, all the confusion and conflict surrounding the concept of the Law of Attraction or the Law of Circles? It’s simple. “What goes around comes around.” However we qualify the electronic substance of life, is how it comes back to us. “Cast your loaves upon the waters and you’ll get one hundred loaves back.”
Now what other great questions would any one of us like answered?
I am at your service.
Only upon learning how to unconditionally love my own Humanity, have I become qualified to call myself a Humanitarian.
That standard is what has been set in place by those of us who know how to do it, as the foundation of our ‘new paradigm’.
It’s the engineer in me that calls, “ALL Aboard!”
Sue Ann Edwards
tumel
and in re-reading this time I found...
Surface Earth
November 11th, 2007 - 7:39 am
Unconditional love to me means no judgement of any kind, it is an acceptance of all without any other thoughts. Like you I cannot say I have felt this, in its pure absolute, even though sometimes I think I feel little glimpses of it
but I realize there is always some sort of judgement, even saying this I realize this is there, in what I say. I question too as Betsy does whether we are capable of this, as humans in form. To me right now I think our spirits are, but to think this is to seperate our form from our spirit and I am not sure if this is right, this seperation, because then I question can we live as pure spirits in human form, I am not sure:) For us to be capable of this, feels like we would be able to fly, because I think our human form is what grounds us, an attachment in a sense and if we were to let go of this, I wonder what happens to our form, so this returns me to wondering again, if we are, as we are now, capable of unconditional love? and if we are capable of this and achieve this what will we be, can it be both form and spirit or will it be spirit alone.
November 11th, 2007 - 10:04 am
Sue Anne,
You write that “Consciousness is not solid, it is fluid and ever changing.”
I would respectfully disagree. Consciousness is solid, it’s the ’stuff’ in consciousness that is forever changing and shifting wherever the moment takes us.
The consciousness is ‘you’, all the ’stuff’ is not.
When J.Z. Knight states “make the known, the unknown” she’s basically asking to let go of all your ’stuff’ (known) so that you can get to ‘you’ (unknown).
Without all the stuff, there are no ‘conditions’ and this is the road to the unconditional. In fact, this is the definition of ‘love’- that which is without conditions and nothing more than that.
Therefore, to get rid of the stuff, just be OK with all of it. When you no longer resist it, it all seems to fade away. As you’ve probably heard before, what you resist, persists
I love reading your posts as they’re very thoughtful. In fact, deeply so!
Mike S
November 11th, 2007 - 10:21 am
Greetings {{MikeS}}
I will repeat again, Consciousness is not solid. Nothing is. Every “form” is a pattern of quantum light packets, called forth from ‘formlessness’ as imagined. The pattern of the form is held in place by three magnetic fields along the x, y and z axis. It is a projection of consciousness, not consciousness itself.
Consciousness is waves. Energetic momentums of focus.
JZ or, Ramtha really, as ‘JZ’ is seperated in consicousness from Ramtha, is speaking of attachments and concepts littering our minds of spiritual denial, of seperation, of limitation, of which JZ’s use of another name, in this case “ramtha”, is an example. There is only a seperation in consciousness because it is imagined. In any ‘channeling’ where another ‘name’ is given, there is a seperation in consciousness, with expanded levels accessed yet UNintegrated.
Names are for form, for body’s, for personality’s. They distinguish us as seperate from each other in the realms of time and space. If Unity awareness is our goal and, with it trancendence, then using any of the same shovels that got us entrenched in seperativeness isn’t especially wise. But since most of us are attached to our personality’s value system, letting go of our shovels is often difficult to do. We are all WILLful.
‘Seeing’ consicousness AS solid, has a lot to do with why expanded levels remain UNaccessed, UNintegrated, seperated in conscious awareness and disconnected in experience.
Letting go of stuff means the stuff that is personality based, which is the same as saying, attached to some BODY of form. Like the worship of Jesus instead of the body of what what Jesus expressed, which was Christ.
We imagine ’seperate’ and we experience ’seperate’.
I AM saying, ‘not seperate’. not solid. waves….with different bands, like wavelenghts of light come in different bands. And the reason I AM saying ‘waves’, fluid NOT solid, is because I’ve been SEEING them all my life. There are currents in the Quantum, just as there are currents in the sky and in the ocean. It’s the reason why I’m so ‘odd’, because I devoted my concentration to studying them and figuring out what relationship they have with what manifests on this plane of activity.
Like I said, we can’t ever come to any kind of in depth understanding, so long as we seperate ourselves from that which we seek to understand. It’s a living contradiction.
Blessings to you this day!
{{hugs}}
November 11th, 2007 - 10:39 am
{{{tumel}}}
Yes, we are ALL capable of it but not while we’ll focused in the personality level of our awareness. I used to be where most everybody else is now. I used to not know it, either.
But I do now.
Unconditional Love is an Absolute. “Always Embraces ALL Ways.”
Grinning….NEGATIVE as well as POSITIVE.
What most of us know and call ‘love’ isn’t. It’s need. Need is not love. But expresses a lack of it. Need barters for conditions. Love entends itself for the joy of extension. Need is out to get something. Love is what we have.
What most of us have been taught, is love upon condition. The condition of ‘good’, which is a qualifying judgment. So when we’re ‘bad’, another qualifying judgment, love is withheld. This love being withheld business, is what creates our needy states.
A ‘good’ Will is a lot different then a Loving Will.
I’m saying don’t bother being of ‘goodwill’, the goal will create a can of worms trying to seperate good from bad. Be a Loving Will.
Rest your anxieties, we don’t lose our bodies. There isn’t any exchange, like the absurd idea of a walk-in. And absurd I say, because it is an “or” concept. Something walks IN and something else walks OUT. This is a trade, a substitution. Concepts of seperation still reign.
Expansions are IN ADDITION to, not in place of. We expand to embrace the parts of ourselves that have always been with us, just unrecognized and seperated in consciousness from. I’m still ‘me’. I just expanded my definition of ‘who’ I AM.
November 11th, 2007 - 12:51 pm
Sue Anne,
You are so right and I apologize I did not mean ’solid’ in terms of ‘form,’ but in terms of permanency.
I like to use the term ‘awareness’. Awareness is what we are. However, I agree that the ‘personality’ stuff in awareness is what we are not. Thus when we detach from the personality concepts in awareness we are then open to expanded awareness.
November 11th, 2007 - 5:53 pm
Thank you for clarifying what you meant{{ Mike}}. I sense what you are talking about with terms of ‘permanency’ is our Core.
Which Is, and Always Will Be, Changeless.
Always will be always.
Infinity will Always be infinite.
Eternity will Always be eternal.
When we’ve divested ourselves of that about us which changes, then we have found our True Selves, which Is, as it has Always Been and Always Will Be.
As for awareness, I understand what you’re talking about. There are many diverse levels of awareness. A quantum packet of light has a type of awareness, as does a rock and a tree. As for us, we’re the bridge between the higher and the lower kingdoms. Some of us are born once, some of us are born again and again, and some of us are born dead and live our whole lives without knowing it. Each are different states of awareness.
Blessings to you, this day!
{{hugs}}
November 12th, 2007 - 9:32 am
So many interesting thoughts and yet no questions pop up for me… Just thoughts to ponder upon and “dwell with”. I saw the Bleep movie thru netflix and want to buy it so I can linger longer with what was presented. I think it is deep enough for my level of concentration right now!
When I think about religion and LOA and today’s mainstream churchy side of life, I see so many parallels when others see right and wrong. It can be very baffling indeed!
I really enjoy your posts and how you present your topics. Thank you. “C”
November 12th, 2007 - 10:01 am
What a delight! “All aboard!”
November 12th, 2007 - 11:58 am
Thank you for the feedback {{Curious c}}!
{hugs}
I certainly understand what you’re saying about what’s presented in the movie is deep enough. I guess that’s it. It’s ALL mental and can really give us some headaches and confusion approaching it from that direction.
Our INTUITION is the level where Understanding and Awareness comes in, that’s what I mean by depth. There’s no FEELING, INTUITIVE understanding because most of us are in our heads trying to figure it out, just like all the scientists in the movie.
It’s immersing ourselves into our FEELING levels and becoming intimate, genuinely and deeply intimate with ourselves, that illuminates the hows in terms of what we keep doing. And it’s this emotional level, that hasn’t been addressed for the most part.
Like the topic of ’security’. Security is an emotion. That makes it a psychological issue not a physical one. And until it is addressed AS a psychological issue, our problems with the subject will continue.
When it comes to buying the movie, I recommend it. The second installment, “Down the Rabbit Hole” has everything that is in “What the Bleep”, it just goes further into each interview and each topic of discussion. The thing has like 4 double sided disks.
Enjoy it but don’t stress yourself trying to mentally figure it out. I’m willing to bet your Intuition and getting deeper and deeper in touch with it, will bring you more in the way of Understadning then any number if mental gymnastics.
Bless their hearts, the Scientists are really trying… and if they could just get out of their heads for a moment, a lot would become clearer.
November 12th, 2007 - 12:32 pm
{{Mike}}…
Something came to mind for you today but first let me apologize…
for typing your name as (mark), instead of (mike) in my second response. I have corrected it. Smiling. I make no claims to knowing how to type. During my youth, if a girl learned how to type she was destined to be a secretary. Wanting to avoid that job position at all costs, I never learned how to type. All being a secretary meant to me was being a wife at the office and I wasn’t sure I even wanted to be one at home at the time.
What I was trying to convey is that there are streams of consciousness, layers and layers of currents. Just like an ocean. And whether we’re Aware of them or not makes no difference in their existence, just ours, when it comes to ‘flying blind’.
Streams of Consciousness, PURE Consciousness emanating from the “Godhead” …”Source”…the “Elohim”…The Third Aspect of the ‘Holy Trinity”, the Holy Spirit, God in Action, God in Expression, The Nature of God, Shekinah..the Womb of Mother.
A Womb with a view.
The Womb exists, whether we’re aware of it from our point of view or not. And everything we perceive as Existence is attached to this Womb with a kind of spiritual umbilical cord.
Does that help or have I completely misunderstood the question?
November 12th, 2007 - 1:06 pm
I saw the movie, too. I was really excited about it when I first heard of it, but I was ultimately disappointed. I agree that it was shallow. On the other hand, as you know better than most (including me), intellectual understanding is a long way from true holistic (for lack of a better word) knowing. It requires a leap that is simply beyond most people. It’s beyond most people I know, at least.
I also am a container for contradictions. I am not this or that, but both. It makes me elusive for most people to understand, but I’m very at home with it. The only real problem I have is sometimes I get stuck between intellect and emotion. They don’t always agree.
As for unconditional love, it’s a thing I work on constantly. And it’s hard work. It’s such a huge concept to fully grasp that I find few people who can even begin to embrace it. Dichotomy and the sense of being right tends to prevail.
On the other hand, maybe it’s just the people I tend to hang out with (through no choice of my own, really).
Thanks for another challenging post!
November 12th, 2007 - 2:23 pm
Sue Ann,
Great question, big question. To be unconditional love is to be true spirit. I know unconditional love on an individual by individual basis, however I do not know of true uncoditional love of humanity. Yes, we are capable, may we strive towards that which we are capable of.
November 13th, 2007 - 9:01 am
Sue Ann, thank you again:) how you explain helps me to understand better what I try to understand about myself. To me non-judgement of all is how I see unconditional love, but perhaps it is my fear of being judged by others that I must get over myself first, that this is the personality thing you speak of, because judgement is a form of a condition.
Since as far back as I can remember I have always disliked being judged, or labelled or some such, and I have always tried so hard not to judge others, to let them be as they are and accept them this way, I think mainly because I so disliked being judged so it has become a very consious thing to me and I am able to see when I judge and I see too when others judge as well, but I know I judge by seeing this in others:) so what I want to fully realize and try to change is that what I see as judgement in others is what I must judge in myself as well, so this is what I try to become more aware of now. It is like a circle to me, going around and around when I think it will stop when I can see no judgement of any kind, because when I do not see it, I will not have it in me either and this is when I think I would be able to fly:)
Sometimes I wonder, since I am interested in how the time we are born in, astrologically, just how much this time affects us, our personalities, am I this way because of the scale sign? I have thought of this before only because I knew even before I began reading of astrology that I did not like being judged and tended to go towards those that I felt did not either, because it was with these people that I could fully be myself, the fear of being judged was never there, so then I wonder why is it there is no fear with some, even initally, but with others there is. What is there that we maybe consiously cannot see, but can feel unconsiously.
November 13th, 2007 - 11:21 pm
{{ggirl}} We’ve got to remain True to our own Hearts.
Well do I know the split between our heads and our hearts.
What if I said our heads are misunderstanding what our hearts are trying to convey? Just as we can misunderstand each other?
And what if, our heads sought to learn our heart’s language and become unfied in our actions? What if head chose to join with Heart to create Wisdom?
Maybe head’s not understanding heart?
Maybe head’s not actually listening to heart in the first place but listening to gut?
Heart can see through illusions.
Heads can’t, unless enjoined with heart.
Listen to your heart and ask it, to explain things to your head. Your own heart knows terms your head understands better than I do.
Hugs.
November 13th, 2007 - 11:44 pm
Loving and Sensitive Mark,
What if I said we can only give as good as we got?
And once we give ‘it’ to ourselves, then we have ‘it’, to give to others as we see fit.
Smiling.
We don’t know how to love ourselves. And that’s the source of all our troubles with each other. If we cant live in peace with ourselves, then there’s no way we can live in peace with one another.
Learning how to love our own self unconditionally comes first. Behind every one of our behaviours, there is a reason, a cause, a belief, that because of it, we reject our self. It’s a condition of acceptance.
When I was little I didn’t need any reasons to enjoy ice cream. I simply did. It’s as I grew up I began placing conditions on my enjoyment. On whether I’d allow myself to. Had I stayed on my diet? Did I deserve it? had I been a good girl?
This is the way have been taught to be with all aspects of love. Judging instead of seeking to understand. Intolerant of our selves. Impatient with ourselves, too.
What whip it takes to keep the rat racing. Oh yes, I was a participant in the rat race once, until I figured out that the winner was still a rat. That’s when I opted for mouse.
Of the two choices, church or field, I chose field. I knew I was still a rodent. And church mice were into denying even that.
Since then I’ve been out standing in my field.
l
November 14th, 2007 - 11:25 am
I fell asleep last night with this on my mind that {{Mark}} had written:
“To be unconditional love is to be true spirit”
Thinking as I fell to sleep,
that to be unconditional love is to be true to our selves. Most of us just don’t realize ‘who’ we are. Since we’ve been taught since birth that we’re something else.
Smiling real big.
November 14th, 2007 - 11:32 am
{{SE}}!!!!
It’s a POSITIVE that is happening. Something very Loving for ALL of us but appearances can be awful as we transition.
It’s like Humpty Dumpty’s shell. It’s not a tragedy or crisis when his shell cracks, though it might very well scare him if all he’s known is inside of that shell. But it has to crack, in order for him to be born.
Humpty didn’t go all to pieces. Humpty hatched.
Happy Birthday!
November 14th, 2007 - 12:41 pm
{{tumel}} Your Insight and Intuition into your own self serves you well. No matter how it appears to our physical eyes, inside, within our inner relams, we are all alike. We all share the same issues, the same underlying patterns. Our differences appear when it comes to what issue is the particular challenge we’ve chosen.
The nice thing about it is, that if it is someone’s challenge, it won’t be another’s. They will have something different as a challenge. So we share ourselves with each other, like one hand washes another. “If you help me with the heavy lifting, I’ll cook you a wonderful meal.”
Our judgments, our conditions, were created to seperate ourselves from what we didn’t like. What we thought was ‘bad’. Like a tribe that thought a baby’s 2 bottom teeth coming in before their 2 top teeth, was an ‘evil’ spirit and would kill the baby in order to protect the tribe.
Fetishes, supersitions, taboos, and sins are all the same thing. Reasons to reject someone from the group. To seperate them from the group. Like removing a rotten apple from the barrel.
This is rejection and it is for this reason that we invented all the conditions. And like you expressed, not a one of us likes the feel of the experience. It doesn’t feel very loving, much less accepting.
It also doesn’t inspire honesty, ’cause we’re too scared of being condemned and/or rejected to feel at ease. So we lie. We hide behind a false mask of ourselves. And our smiles don’t go all the way up to our eyes. Or like you said, avoid people.
A lot of what you have shared revolves around one central issue, that of “Justice”. And if you ponder it for a while, I bet you’ll come up with all the reasons why you feel the way you do.
Because what our judgments attempt to do, is tip the scales of Justice in our favor, after we have first perceived inJustice.
“Justice”….a sticky issue you’ve brought up. Verry sticky because of all our different definitions of it. It’s all our basic differences surrounding this subject that has caused all our cultures to clash rather then merge upon meeting. I will go further into another post.
The whole judgment thing is the workings of a virus, a consciousness virus. It pops up all over the place, coloring almost everything we do. This is another one that needs a seperate post to do it ‘justice’ (snickering)
As for astrology, I’m specific. ESOteric, not exoteric. ESO studies what’s hidden. EXO studies what our eyes can see.
The reason why it’s called hidden, is for two reasons. One, because it deals with our inner natures. And two, because anything having to do with even reconizing we have an inner nature has had to be hidden, veiled in symbolism to convey meaning, underground, so to speak, for to know anything about it meant a death sentence for millenia.
It’s why those of us familiar with it, feel a great reluctancy sticking our necks out. It wasn’t by accident I was born in a country where my religious freedom was protected. As was my Freedom of speech.
The freedom of religion liberty is the ONLY one that all our government agencies treat like a hot potato. Hands off messing with this one, that’d be political suicide. Which makes it perfect to use as a secure foundation. “Base” Can’t tag me when I’m on base.
Now by the time I throw in the little ditty that other people’s feelings ARE other people’s feelings and I CAN’T by any semblance of rational honesty, be BLAMED for what peptide other people’s brains produce in response to what I’ve shared..then I’ve pretty much resolved all the arguments surrounding our freedom of speech, too.
It’s because the ground I’m standing on is so solid, that I have the Courage to speak now.
ESOteric…the journey of our Soul through states of consciousness/awareness. I looked for the exact quote for you but can’t put my finger on it right now. It has to do with things of a moment, having all the intrinsic qualities of that moment. And this relates to gravitational/magnetic fields. It’s meaning is in what we have to work with. Our raw materials. It doesn’t have anything to do with our tools, for we all share the same toolbox and all share the same powers of transformation.
I compare it to being service personnel that have volunteered to help clean up a big mess. We each choose a small part and do the best we can. The big mess belongs to all of us, not any one in particular but everyone in general. We’re each doing the best we know how, being the best drop we can be in our collective bucket.
Whatever one of us dumps into the bucket, we all get to taste.
How are you for “tart”?
November 15th, 2007 - 10:26 am
thank you Sue Ann, again I realize something I was not consious of and I am fine with tart, I just might need time sometimes to appreciate it.
November 2nd, 2009 - 1:26 pm
[...] http://www.hera-kles.com/Blog/2007/11/10/make-known-the-unknown/ [...]